Wedding day jitters
Apr. 29th, 2011 02:12 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I just got back from a munchie run to WalMart. Had to snag a few nibbles for The Wedding...an Event like this demands something a cut above peanut butter and crackers. So I got some veggie cream cheese and a small beef summer sausage and some marked-down Easter goodies. Nomnomnom!
I remember watching Charles and Diana's wedding. It certainly doesn't seem like 30 years ago! I wasn't wild about the wedding dress itself---good grief, you could convert the damned train into a very posh car cover---but the little pink suit she wore when they left for the honeymoon was darling, especially the hat!
I particularly recall a conversation shortly before the day...in the frenzy of coverage, the media reported that Diana had had a gynocological visit. The person I was talking to commented that they (meaning the Royal Family) had to make sure she was still a virgin.
I was quite shocked. In 1981? Really, who cared about such prudery? (I later read a bio of the couple that confirmed that yes indeed, virginity verification was vital!)
I haven't heard any such palaver about today's bride. Is she or isn't she? That's nobody's business but her own! (Although I'm inclined to believe they have. They've lived together and vacationed together and for heaven's sake, it's the 21st century!)
Meanwhile, I'm anxious to see her dress. Since it will undoubtedly influence bridal fashion for the next decade, I'm really hoping for something classy. In fact, if Kate reverses the strapless-crumb-catcher-with-a-corset trend, I'll be overjoyed.
TLC is my channel of choice for coverage. Clinton Kelly is one of the hosts, and I'm sure he'll have some pithy comments about how everyone is dressed. I also look forward to seeing HATS. The Brits DO hats...honestly, if I'm ever over there again, I'm definitely going to invest in a fab bonnet!
TTFN!
.
I remember watching Charles and Diana's wedding. It certainly doesn't seem like 30 years ago! I wasn't wild about the wedding dress itself---good grief, you could convert the damned train into a very posh car cover---but the little pink suit she wore when they left for the honeymoon was darling, especially the hat!
I particularly recall a conversation shortly before the day...in the frenzy of coverage, the media reported that Diana had had a gynocological visit. The person I was talking to commented that they (meaning the Royal Family) had to make sure she was still a virgin.
I was quite shocked. In 1981? Really, who cared about such prudery? (I later read a bio of the couple that confirmed that yes indeed, virginity verification was vital!)
I haven't heard any such palaver about today's bride. Is she or isn't she? That's nobody's business but her own! (Although I'm inclined to believe they have. They've lived together and vacationed together and for heaven's sake, it's the 21st century!)
Meanwhile, I'm anxious to see her dress. Since it will undoubtedly influence bridal fashion for the next decade, I'm really hoping for something classy. In fact, if Kate reverses the strapless-crumb-catcher-with-a-corset trend, I'll be overjoyed.
TLC is my channel of choice for coverage. Clinton Kelly is one of the hosts, and I'm sure he'll have some pithy comments about how everyone is dressed. I also look forward to seeing HATS. The Brits DO hats...honestly, if I'm ever over there again, I'm definitely going to invest in a fab bonnet!
TTFN!
.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-29 08:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-29 07:23 pm (UTC).
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 01:45 am (UTC)Back to the fatherhood issue. It's one that applies to any situation (inc fanfic) where lineage is crucial. By the time you have DNA to test, it's too late to avoid a scandal. If Guinevere is a virgin, it eliminates the possiblity of having to admit the King has been cuckolded.
There'a also the pesky problem of what to do with a child of the Queen who is not royal. It's not like the old days, when you would tell the world it was stillborn and ship the kid off to be raised by your old nanny or a poor relation overseas. Nowadays, Gwenevere would most likely want the child at her side.
Arthur could formally adopt the baby and give it the title of Prince(ess), but the child could never inherit the throne (no adopted child can inherit a peerage). The next son or daughter to be born would be in line for the throne. There's no way the poor kid could escape the stigma and notoriety of being the kid who isn't really a prince(ess).
Much better for everyone all around if we know Gwenivere is a virgin.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-29 12:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-29 07:28 pm (UTC).
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-29 07:44 pm (UTC)British women tend to have smaller hips and bigger busts overall than American women, so the dress wouldn't have been flattering to anyone with some booty baggage. :D
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 06:19 pm (UTC)I would think they'd have a little more pride- I never entertained the thought of strapless when I got married and I was a whisp of a girl back then. I don't even do sleeveless these days as I am so self-conscious about my arms.
Don't get me started on the brides who have LOTS of upper tattoos and chose their dresses poorly- it just looks trashy to me.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 07:00 pm (UTC)I've never done strapless either. Even back when I was in really good shape, it just wasn't me. And I'm so fair-skinned that the sight of my bare arms would blind onlookers, so that's out too.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 07:31 pm (UTC)My daughter was able to pull off the strapless/sleeveless wedding gown but she's a size 2 and tiny-
* Giggles on the fair-skinned blinding comment! I am with you- I figure if I don't want to see it in the mirror, I shouldn't object strangers to my bodily shortcomings. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 07:50 pm (UTC)The past few years I've had an awful time trying to find nice blouses and dresses to wear to work because everything's cut down to 'there' or up to 'here.' Since I work for a priest, modest dress is a job requirement, and I could frequently find suitable clothes only in thrift shops because current fashion wasn't turning out anything I could wear.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 08:10 pm (UTC)As with the "gypsies and sluts go on a cruise" look? (That stuck with me for some reason.)
.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 08:15 pm (UTC)I do see some things that are really cute and would fit me great except they're so darned short. (And considering I'm barely five fee tall, that's saying a lot.) Designers need to get it into their heads that not all of us have pencil legs and can get away with wearing a tunic that barely covers our underpants.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 11:39 pm (UTC).
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 08:06 pm (UTC)I second that! Down with hoocie-mamas!
(Who the HELL *are* the Kardashians, and why am I supposed to give a damn about them?!)
.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 08:09 pm (UTC)Corgikid refers to all reality TV as "fertile, fat, filthy and short" since that seems to be the main themes of most of the shows. :-D
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 08:12 pm (UTC)Classic!
.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 08:03 pm (UTC)Being a tattoo afficianado myself, I'm only bothered if they're poorly done tattoos. I'm also of the opinion that the ONLY good reason for a backless dress is to show off a particularly spectacular backpiece.
.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 08:39 pm (UTC)I tend to wear baggier clothes rather than tight ones- I can't stand things to feel snug. I've lost 10 lbs but still bought size 2X shirts from the thrift store today- I just like to be comfy.
I see a LOT of people that I'd like to ask, "Hon, don't you have a reflectional device at home?" ha ha
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 11:46 pm (UTC)I said to myself, My god, if I was that big, I wouldn't THINK of wearing anything that tight!
And then I stopped, because I WAS/AM that big...and I don't.
.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-01 12:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-01 12:55 am (UTC).
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-29 04:32 pm (UTC)The English can do hats but they're not doing them very well recently. I'm not impressed with the fascinator at all - and what were Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie thinking? (The older generations of women still do hats well, though.)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-29 07:39 pm (UTC)The hats...OMG, so many hats! I agree completely about E & B's hats, especially that odd sculptural thing of E's. (Clinton said it looked like a skee ball target and he wanted to throw things at it.)
Posh SpiceVictoria Beckham was wearing an odd little thing that looked like it was going to fall off herface at any moment. (It would've driven me mad. David looked good enough to eat, though.) And good grief, what was with all the random pheasant feathers?!.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-29 07:57 pm (UTC)I know the Brits are into crazy hats, but some of the ones I saw were hideous!
I remember hearing a couple of months ago that there would be no virginity check on Kate - probably because she and Will were already living together and had been for awhile.
All in all, it was a beautiful wedding. If you want to see photos of the couple, Westminster Abbey, and the cakes, check out the official flickr photostream of the British monarchy HERE (http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishmonarchy/).
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-29 10:35 pm (UTC).
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-29 08:26 pm (UTC)Her dress was gorgeous and no one that weighs over 125 lbs could have pulled off that waistline. She has very good taste. Cake made me hungry!
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-29 10:38 pm (UTC)I snoozed before the cake made an appearance---these days, 20 hours without sleep is about my limit. But I'm sure I'll catch it in the recaps!
.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-29 11:00 pm (UTC)Nevertheless, she wanted to see the wedding, too, so I pulled up the video stream and prayed that it would work in our work cmputers. It DID!
Two hours of peace and quiet with some rare comments about the hats. Yes, E and B were... *flails* E´s make-up was either running or she was going for a severe gothic look, whicever it was, she looked like a raccoon, honestly.
The dress was gorgeous. Since the quality of the stream was bad, I thought at first that the back WAS indeed corset like (with the all the talk of she losing weight and all) but later I saw the cute buttons in the back.
Oh, and my bossette made a comment that had me smothering laughter. Cameras show Sir Elton John singing, standing side by side with his husband. I say that vow, he is singing with his spouse. My bossette asks, SINCERELY, if that spouse was standing behind Elton (there was some lady with a pale blue hat). I bit my tongue and hummed non-committaly. If she does not know by now who Sir Elton is, who am I to say anything?
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 12:01 am (UTC)E's make-up reminded me of Pru from Blade Runner, like she put it on with an airbrush. What a fright! I liked the blue-green color her sis was wearing, although the dress itself didn't particularly flatter.
LOL about Bossette's naivte. You've mentioned how staunchly anti-gay she is, so why am I not surprised she's oblivious?!
.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 01:59 am (UTC)*busts into giggles*
On a serious note, I don't know how often the kids saw him after Diana died (beyond charity events like the Prince's Trust(?) concert and such), but I remember how close he and Diana were. She practically held him together during Versace's funeral. I thought it was lovely for William to have invited him. Sir Elton seemed to be enjoying the moment -- and I think I saw him getting a bit misty-eyed at one point. *wibble*
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 03:10 am (UTC)Yes, I remember how he was during Versace. His friendship with Diana was very very heartwarming.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-04-30 03:58 am (UTC).